Can simulation replace part of clinical time? Two parallel randomised controlled trials.

نویسندگان

  • Kathryn Watson
  • Anthony Wright
  • Norman Morris
  • Joan McMeeken
  • Darren Rivett
  • Felicity Blackstock
  • Anne Jones
  • Terry Haines
  • Vivienne O'Connor
  • Geoffrey Watson
  • Raymond Peterson
  • Gwendolen Jull
چکیده

CONTEXT Education in simulated learning environments (SLEs) has grown rapidly across health care professions, yet no substantive randomised controlled trial (RCT) has investigated whether SLEs can, in part, substitute for traditional clinical education. METHODS Participants were physiotherapy students (RCT 1, n = 192; RCT 2, n = 178) from six Australian universities undertaking clinical education in an ambulatory care setting with patients with musculoskeletal disorders. A simulated learning programme was developed as a replica for clinical education in musculoskeletal practice to replace 1 week of a 4-week clinical education placement. Two SLE models were designed. Model 1 provided 1 week in the SLE, followed by 3 weeks in clinical immersion; Model 2 offered training in the SLE in parallel with clinical immersion during the first 2 weeks of the 4-week placement. Two single-blind, multicentre RCTs (RCT 1, Model 1; RCT 2, Model 2) were conducted using a non-inferiority design to determine if the clinical competencies of students part-educated in SLEs would be any worse than those of students educated fully in traditional clinical immersion. The RCTs were conducted simultaneously, but independently. Within each RCT, students were stratified on academic score and randomised to either the SLE group or the control ('Traditional') group, which undertook 4 weeks of traditional clinical immersion. The primary outcome measure was a blinded assessment of student competency conducted over two clinical examinations at week 4 using the Assessment of Physiotherapy Practice (APP) tool. RESULTS Students' achievement of clinical competencies was no worse in the SLE groups than in the Traditional groups in either RCT (Margin [Δ] ≥ 0.4 difference on APP score; RCT 1: 95% CI - 0.07 to 0.17; RCT 2: 95% CI - 0.11 to 0.16). CONCLUSIONS These RCTs provide evidence that clinical education in an SLE can in part (25%) replace clinical time with real patients without compromising students' attainment of the professional competencies required to practise.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Why do we need randomised controlled trials to assess behavioural interventions?

The value of the randomised controlled trial still generates debate. Although some of the earliest examples of these trials can be found in behavioural and psychosocial research, this is not an area that has adopted readily the randomised controlled trial to assess interventions. Two recent developments have intensified debate about the role of randomised controlled trials—the urgent need to fi...

متن کامل

Relation between burden of disease and randomised evidence in sub-Saharan Africa: survey of research.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether the amount of randomised clinical research on various medical conditions is related to the burden of disease and health needs of the local populations in sub-Saharan Africa. DESIGN Construction and analysis of comprehensive database of randomised controlled trials in sub-Saharan Africa based on Medline, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and several African...

متن کامل

Sample size requirements for pilot randomised controlled trials with binary outcomes: a simulation study

Aims There is lack of consensus over what sample size should be used for pilot trials to inform the design of definitive randomised controlled trials. The majority of the existing recommendations focus on estimating the variation of a continuous outcome and relatively little attention is paid to binary outcomes. The aim of this research was to investigate the sample size required to precisely e...

متن کامل

The Management of Nipple Pain and/or Trauma Associated with Breastfeeding

All studies were categorised according to the strength of the evidence based on the following revised classification system. Level I Evidence obtained from a systematic review of all relevant randomised controlled trials. Level II Evidence obtained from at least one properly designed randomised controlled trial. Level III.1 Evidence obtained from well designed pseudo-randomised controlled trial...

متن کامل

Eye Care for Intensive Care Patients

All studies were categorised according to the strength of the evidence based on the following revised classification system. Level I Evidence obtained from a systematic review of all relevant randomised controlled trials. Level II Evidence obtained from at least one properly designed randomised controlled trial. Level III.1 Evidence obtained from well designed pseudo-randomised controlled trial...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Medical education

دوره 46 7  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2012